ECJ: Melli Bank and US-Iran-sanctions

Jan 18, 2022 | Banks, Iran

Towers of the Palace of the Court (pixabay curia-g25d368ccd_1920)

In a judgment dated December 21, 2021 (Case C-124/20), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for the first time dealt with the effects of the European Blocking Statute.

The plaintiff was Melli, an Iranian bank based in Hamburg. Telekom Deutschland GmbH had duly terminated all existing contracts with the bank after the USA reactivated its Iran sanctions under then President Donald Trump. Melli Bank is sanctioned as a legal entity in the USA (so-called SDN listing by OFAC). US persons are not allowed to enter into contracts with these entities. The USA wants to extend this prohibition worldwide (extraterritorial).

Melli Bank considered the termination of the contracts to be unlawful because the so-called Blocking Statute (Regulation No. 2271/96) prohibits European companies from following foreign sanctions. The regulation was created in 1996 to counter U.S. sanctions against Cuba. The scope of the Blocking Statute was then expanded in 2018 to include Iran sanctions.

The ECJ now stated in its Melli ruling:

  1. The prohibition on complying with foreign sanctions issued by a third country (in this case, the USA) in violation of international law applies even if the European company has not received a request or instruction from the third country (in this case, the USA).
  2. The ordinary (timely) termination of the telecommunications contracts was also permissible without justification. However, the company concerned (here: Melli Bank) can object that the terminating party (here: Telekom) unlawfully followed a foreign prohibition.
  3. The prohibition of termination, which follows from the Blocking Regulation, may not in turn violate the principles of freedom to conduct a business pursuant to Articles 16 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

The last point in particular is important, as Telekom itself generates around 50% of its revenue in the USA. A violation of the U.S.-Iran sanctions would jeopardize this market. On the other hand, Telekom had failed to apply for an exemption. This application for exemption under the Blocking Statute would have made it possible to comply with the U.S. sanctions without violating the Blocking Statute.

Following this preliminary ruling by the ECJ on the interpretation of European law, the Hamburg Higher Regional Court must now make a final decision on the legal dispute.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions:

Prof. Dr. Darius O. Schindler

Haydnplatz 3 | 76133 Karlsruhe

Telephone: +49 (0)721 85 140 840

Print Friendly, PDF & Email